Prospective authors are invited to submit manuscripts for possible publication in JEO. JEO publishes original material highlighting theoretical and empirically-based research articles, critical reflection pieces, case studies, and classroom innovations relevant to computer-mediated learning (including teaching, learning, assessment, pedagogy, content and organizational issues). Manuscripts must be appropriately grounded within relevant literature and justified with theory, evidence, and/or research; qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods are appropriate.

Submission Deadline

JEO is published in January, May, and September of each year.  Submissions are accepted on a rolling basis; accepted manuscripts will be published at the earliest possible date.

Types of Submissions

• Theoretical
• Empirical research
• Critical reflection
• Case Study
• Innovative methodologies and applications
• Professional development
• Program evaluation

Manuscript Preparation

JEO hosts a range of research strategies; most common formats include theoretical, empirical, critical reflection, case study, and classroom innovation. Submissions should clearly highlight the significance and implications of the investigation to computer-mediated learning; all manuscripts should be formatted according to APA Style. The American Psychological Association provides the following general guidelines for communicating your scholarly work:

• Present the problem, question or issue early in the manuscript.
• Show how the issue is grounded, shaped, and directed by theory.
• Connect the issue to previous work in a literature review that is pertinent and informative but not exhaustive.
• State explicitly the hypotheses under investigation or the target of the theoretical review.
• Keep the conclusions within the boundaries of the findings and/or scope of the theory.
• Demonstrate how the study or scholarly approach has helped to address the original issue.
• Identify and discuss what theoretical or practical implications can be drawn from this work.

Suggestions for effective manuscript submissions:

• Title - Titles should not exceed 15 words and should provide a clear introduction to the point of your manuscript.
• Abstract – The abstract is a short summary (50-100 words) of your work that provides the key information for readers to determine their interest in reading the complete article. The abstract should be accurate, thorough, and readable. 
• Body - Information should be organized and sub-titled to facilitate flow and understanding of key issues. Authors should use APA Style guidelines to organize and present information in a manner that is easily communicated to readers. JEO has no length limitations for manuscripts; authors are encouraged to be direct and concise to maintain a focus on key issues.
• References – Carefully select references to ensure that citations are current and relevant; prioritize credible, published sources that have proven pertinent and valuable to the relevant investigations.
• Tables, Figures, Appendices & Graphics – When necessary, include supporting documents to illustrate findings, relevance or utilization of materials. Prioritize supplements that promote easy, efficient integration of suggestions, findings or techniques into classroom (such as rubrics, assignments, etc.) applications.

Manuscript (including citations and references) must strictly follow APA style as dictated by the 7^th Edition of the American Psychological Association Publication Manual (http://www.apastyle.org/).

Manuscripts must be written in clear English.

Maximum length of submission is thirty pages (A4 or Letter size with one inch margins), double spaced, including abstract, appendices, references, figures, and tables (with some length exceptions for supporting documents). 

Language

All manuscripts submitted to JEO should be written in clear, concise English. 

Fees

JEO charges no fees. Aligned with the mission of open access publishing, JEO does not charge submission, article, processing, author or access fees.

Original Work

Submission to JEO indicates that the manuscript (or a similar version of it) has not been previously published, accepted for publication, and/or is not currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. Authors must obtain all appropriate institutional and IRB approvals prior to submission. In addition, authors are responsible for the accuracy of references within the manuscript.

Identifying Information

To facilitate the masked portion of the manuscript review process, the author’s name and other identifying information should NOT appear anywhere on the manuscript (including the title page); the manuscript should be written in a generalized fashion that does not directly divulge authorship or institutional affiliation.

Policy on Generative AI

As an academic journal, we recognize the potential benefits and ethical concerns of using generative artificial intelligence (AI) as a research tool. We believe that AI can serve as a valuable tool in assisting researchers with data analysis, authorship, and other research-related tasks. However, we also acknowledge the importance of ethical considerations when using AI in research. Our policy statement is grounded in the principle that AI should be used in ways that uphold ethical values such as fairness, transparency, accountability, and respect for individual rights. Authors must include a disclosure statement with their manuscript outlining the names and versions of the AI used and the extent of their use in the manuscript. This requirement encourages authors to carefully consider how they employ AI and promotes transparency in the research process.

Use of AI in Writing Assistance:
While the use of AI for writing assistance is permitted, authors must ensure that the final manuscript reflects their individual writing style, thoughts, and unique contributions. AI should serve as a support tool, not a replacement for the author’s intellectual input. Manuscripts should avoid sounding overly automated or generic, ensuring that the work retains its academic integrity and personal voice.

Encouragement for AI in Copyediting:
Authors are encouraged to utilize AI for copyediting purposes, such as improving language clarity, conciseness, organization, communication, and formatting. AI can be a valuable tool to enhance the overall quality of the manuscript without compromising the originality of the content. However, authors should document how AI was used during the editing process within the disclosure statement to maintain transparency.

Transparency and Documentation:
Researchers are expected to be fully transparent about the use of AI in their research. This includes providing detailed documentation of the AI tools used, the extent of their involvement in data analysis, writing, or any other research-related task, and the measures taken to ensure ethical use. Researchers should also disclose any limitations or potential biases of the AI models and make their data and models available for scrutiny and replication.

Ethical Considerations and Bias Mitigation:
Researchers must ensure that the data used to train AI models is representative and unbiased, and that the algorithms are transparent and explainable. Continuous bias assessment and mitigation should be part of the research process. To ensure comprehensive and balanced analysis, researchers are encouraged to consider using multiple AI models or combining AI with other research methods.

AI in Peer Review and Editorial Processes:
AI may be used to assist in generating review feedback. However, all AI-generated feedback will be reviewed and validated by human reviewers to prevent potential errors or biases from influencing the review process. This ensures that the integrity of the peer review process is maintained.

Consent for AI-Assisted Copyediting:
Accepted manuscripts may be reviewed by AI to assist with copyediting to fix simple punctuation and grammar errors, to confirm compliance with APA style, and to ensure clarity and readability. All changes will be tracked in the file for authors to review before publication. This process ensures that no content will be altered without the authors’ knowledge, maintaining the integrity and accuracy of the manuscript. By submitting a manuscript to this journal, authors provide consent for the manuscript to be uploaded to AI platforms for the purpose of copyediting once accepted. The journal guarantees that this process will comply with all relevant data protection laws, ensuring the confidentiality and security of the authors' work.

Ethical Use and Transparency:
Researchers must obtain informed consent from participants before collecting or using any data and ensure that the privacy and confidentiality of individuals and their personal information are protected. Researchers must be aware of the potential biases and limitations of generative AI and take steps to mitigate these issues.

Researchers must be transparent about the use of generative AI in their research, including acknowledging its contributions in any publications or presentations. While AI should not be listed as a co-author, its use as a writing tool should be identified in an author note.

This journal supports the ethical use of generative AI as a research tool. We encourage researchers to follow these guidelines to ensure that their use of this technology is conducted in an ethical and responsible manner and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in their field.